Method Cards for STEM teachers and trainers

With Method Cards, you can create good and engaging teaching sessions. Use them to help you plan your lessons, so you can introduce Green Soft Skills in an engaging way.

Method 1: Urban Green Space Development Symposium

Working time: 45-60 minutes

Toolbox and setting: The use of particular tools is not required

1. Symposium Introduction and Theme Setting (15 minutes) - Introduce the Urban Green Space Development Symposium theme, highlighting the importance of green spaces in urban environments for biodiversity, public health, community well-being, and climate resilience. - Provide an overview of the objectives, format, and expectations for student presentations, emphasizing the role of public speaking in effectively communicating ideas and proposals for urban green space development.

2. Project Development and Preparation (60 minutes) - Prior to the symposium, allocate time for students to develop and refine their research projects, design proposals, or practical interventions focused on urban green space development. - Encourage students to explore innovative approaches, such as green infrastructure, urban forestry, community gardens, or green roofs, and consider factors like accessibility, equity, and sustainability in their designs.

3. Presentation Design and Rehearsal (45 minutes) - Guide students in structuring their presentations to effectively communicate the objectives, methodology, findings, and recommendations of their urban green space projects. - Provide opportunities for students to rehearse their presentations, focusing on clear articulation, engaging storytelling, and visual aids to convey the importance and potential impact of their proposals.

4. Urban Green Space Development Symposium (90 minutes) - Host the symposium, featuring student presentations in a conference-style format, with each participant allotted a designated time slot to deliver their talk and engage with the audience. - Showcase a diverse range of urban green space projects and proposals, highlighting innovative designs, sustainability features, community engagement strategies, and potential benefits for urban residents and ecosystems.

5. Audience Engagement and Feedback (30 minutes) - Facilitate interactive Q&A sessions following each presentation, encouraging audience members to ask questions, offer feedback, and engage in discussions about the feasibility, effectiveness, and scalability of the showcased urban green space projects. - Provide feedback forms or digital surveys for audience members to provide constructive feedback on the presentations, helping students assess the clarity, persuasiveness, and impact of their communication strategies.

6. Reflection and Next Steps (20 minutes) - Conclude the symposium with a reflection session where students share their experiences, insights, and lessons learned from participating in the Urban Green Space Development Symposium. - Encourage students to reflect on the potential real-world impact of their urban green space projects and proposals, and identify opportunities for further research, collaboration, or implementation in fostering sustainable and resilient cities.

Outcomes: Through the Urban Green Space Development Symposium, students have the opportunity to showcase their research, creativity, and advocacy efforts aimed at enhancing green spaces in urban environments. By engaging in public speaking engagements and sharing their projects and proposals, students contribute to the discourse on urban sustainability and inspire positive change towards creating greener, healthier, and more livable cities.

Method 2: The Fishbowl

Description: the activity simplifies a debating situation, avoiding the issue of having a large group trying to discuss openly a topic / problem, by selecting a smaller core group for active discussions. Facilitation is focused on the core group discussion, while others listen and reflect. As there are less people discussing, it is easier to facilitate and reach a conclusion on clear grounds.

Working time: 20-45 minutes

Toolbox and setting: The use of particular tools is not required

A few participants (ideally 3 – 6 people), from a larger group, are selected to actively discuss while the rest of the participants (up to a maximum of about 50 people for comfort) sit around or in front and observe without interrupting/interacting with the selected group.   This tool is especially useful when there is a complex or “hot topic” where stages of the critical thinking process may be hectic, while still keeping a variety of perspectives.

  Variations of the technique is whether to set a “closed conversation” among a specific group or open one or more chairs to “visitors”, members of the audience, who want to ask questions or make comments.

The activity can be even more inclusive if the time is extended and every 5-10 minutes, one or two selected members are shifted with other individuals from the larger group.

Note, it is possible to use this technique onsite and online.

SOFTEN tips: While the technique is self-organized once the discussion gets underway, the fishbowl process usually has a facilitator or moderator. The fishbowl is best used as part of a larger process of discussion and decision-making.

Outcomes: knowledge (listen, observe), apply (judge), analyse (distinguish, evaluate), create (integrate)

• Maintain control in debating situations over a hot topic.
• Maintain a variety of perspectives in a xebate
• Give a chance to the observers to have less emotional involvement and potentially increased quality in reflection and understanding of the issue considered. Green mindset behaviours: the technique is directly applicable for discussing the notion of green transition, for example if that is a positive change for all individuals and the society.

Read more:
● The Fishbowl technique: https://www.betterevaluation.org/methods-approaches/methods/fishbowl-technique

Want more Method Cards?

Scroll to Top